Where did McNamara go?

  When I was in elementary school, it was a Vietnam War. I remember that at that time, I read a photo in the newspaper titled “McNamara slammed down.” On the screen, the US Defense Secretary McNamara, who was “downfield” because of the unfavorable war, took a suitcase. Boarding the plane in the darkness of the night, leaving… It seems that the image is hanging, it seems that the end of the road, “the end” is very bleak.

  After McNamara’s “downward”, where did he go? When I grew up, I realized that on that day, “the cadre of the squad”, McNamara, took the suitcase, both the next and the next, to be his World Bank president…

  It is said that this is very rare on the other side. Before McNamara became the Secretary of Defense, he was originally a financial expert, and he was quite a bit in his stomach. After a few years, the official of the Pentagon did not lose the profession. Now the minister did not do it. He left the turbulent officialdom and the smoke-filled battlefield, took care of a commercial bank that was more than a must, and returned to his old profession and old. Acting. It just “changed” a “shoulder”, so “the end” does not seem so “depressed.”

  The feeling of “desolation” is the feeling of our people. Not to mention our older generation, many of them, because of poverty, can’t read books, poor thinks, and made a revolution with the revolution, so it seems that there is only one “shoulder”, there is no change, and I have to go to politics for a lifetime. Of course, the rationality or limitations of history cannot be demanded. The problem is that most of our officials now have professional professions. Many of them have high academic qualifications. Before they were in politics, they were experts in their respective fields. Unfortunately, after being an official, they were several years later. When the circle was drawn, the original professional painting was forgotten and turned into a “professional politician” who could only go to the official road. That is to say, they originally had “two shoulders”, one is called knowledgeization, and the other is called revolutionization, but the official way of going down the road, but only “one shoulder” left. Because “no shoulders can be exchanged”, there is no way, so I have to go to the end of an officialdom, how can I not “down”, how can I not take the suitcase of McNamara to leave. Between public opinion, we often criticize our officials for “love stacks”. In fact, they must also understand them. They have been officials for decades. The professional ABC has forgotten all of them. A little “martial arts” has also been abolished. Officer, if he does not “Defence Minister”, even the “World Bank” will not play an abacus, you call him not “love stack”, call him “exit mechanism”, call him “down”, what should he do? He can only feel “depressed” and can only do it with his scalp. Therefore, we must give a little understanding. However, this “understanding” is bitter and worthy of repentance.

  Of course, after the “downward”, although the belly is full of economy, but can not go to the “World Bank.” For example, Henry Kissinger, the Secretary of State is not right, the next field, to return to the Harvard Law School that he came out as a professor and doctor. However, Harvard said: You have some knowledge, and the profession is good. But when you have been a politician for a long time, you want to talk about what you want to say tomorrow, and then, with the famous celebrity, “along dinner.” Public figures are used to it. Where do you calm down and give me a big lesson and a doctor? So please ask another high, let’s not you…

  This is of course another rule – called “changing shoulders” and rules. But this rule, of course, is not only reflected in a “state secretary transfer”…